Showing posts with label Internet Marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Internet Marketing. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 23, 2009

How to Turn Paying Customers into Pirates

I want to use my registered copy of Babylon 7 Pro, including the additional professional dictionaries “Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus”, “Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary and Thesaurus” and “Britannica Encyclopedia” on my new Dell laptop with MS Vista (and soon on Windows 7). This is not much to ask for you would think. Hey, I bought this stuff directly from the author of the software and paid good money for it.

Babylon_logo_ani I entered all license keys yesterday and everything was fine. Today all keys are gone and except for one that unlocks one of the three additional dictionaries, none is working anymore. When I entered the codes again, I received the message that I must have made a typo or something. I didn’t make a typo, thanks but no thanks.

I went to their web site at Babylon.com I used the online form to retrieve license keys that they have created for this purpose I guess, enter the captcha code and my email address and submit the form. The form neither returned an error nor acknowledged the input telling me that new and valid license keys will be send to me again. Since I also did not get an email yet, I assume that it did not work as it was intended (hint: this implies another suggestion for the folks at Babylon).

This is not the first time that I had to contact them about this. I lost count of how many different license keys I got from them for the same stuff over the past 7 plus years since I am a paying PRO user of the software*

Their paranoia about software piracy disgusts me. I should get a pirated version of your software instead, because that one is at least working.

*I am a user of the Babylon software since the mid 1990s. It used to be free for several years, when it was still in beta and I was using a cracked version when they first started to charge money for their software, without giving long time beta users a break to make the legitimate switch to the pro version. Up until version 4 they also had an Ad Ware supported version as an option, which was also free. I still have the setup files for their old version 3.2, 4.0, 5.0, 6, 7 and 7.5.2.10. The latter one is the version that I installed yesterday.

I always supported them and recommended the software sincerely to friends and other people. I renewed my support once more, when I paid the full price for their PRO version in 2002 and bought upgrades and additional professional dictionaries over the years since. Now I won't buy another upgrade to version 8 anymore, because I had have it with with their crap.

I demanded (No, I did not ask nicely this time) that they are going to send me working license keys or better ONE license key for Babylon 7 Pro and the 3 pro dictionaries, which I paid them money for.

This issue with their license keys and the way that they let legitimate customers jump through hoops before they will be able to use the software does not help to win customer loyalty nor sympathy. Users don't have to put up with this, if they get the pirated version of the software. That means legitimate users get penalized for actually paying them money for a license over the ones who download the free pirated and cracked (fixed) one.

Spartan_Pirate_Logo_by_TheQuezotThink about it. Which version would you prefer?

The crack is an improvement of the software, a bug fix. This isn’t the first time where this is the case. As a matter of fact, many crackers get started by removing faulty copy protections from software they legitimate purchased licenses for, but were unable to use it as they intended for one reason or another, be it a compatibility issue or a use of the software in a different way than the developer originally intended.

Their paranoia does not help them to get more users to pay for their software. I would bet that the opposite is the case. At least they are not going to win any points with their paying customer base and decrease the likelihood that those existing users will recommend the software to friends and colleagues, not to mention becoming evangelists of it, as I used to be for them once. 

It’s a great translation tool that can be extended with additional custom made dictionaries that are free and were created by other Babylon users over the years. You can enable dictionaries to pull results from online or download them and install locally on your machine that you are able to use them, even if you are not connected to the Internet. The main problem that this software has is its copy protection. There is only one other thing, which does not really have to do with the main Babylon software itself, but with something else that they shovel down the throats of their customers without asking them, if they want to get it shoveled or not …

Part 2: The Babylon Toolbar Issue

After I installed Babylon Pro V7.X my Internet Explorer start pages suddenly looked like this.

babylon-ie-homepage

Who do think they think they are that they can install their stupid browser toolbar for Internet Explorer and change my home page to their own web site at “http://search.babylon.com/home”? All that without asking for my permission of course.

They did not ask for my permission during the install of Babylon (Version 7.x, sorry, but I didn't buy a license for V8 so I don't know, if they still do it or not). I also looked at the configuration screens for the software and did not see the option to disable your toolbar and/or change my default home page back to what it was. I have not checked yet, but I am sure that they also changed my default search provider to Babylon.

This is not only arrogant and intrusive, but also unethical. They should at least have the decency to provide an easy way to remove it. Include the uninstall option in a “Babylon” folder in the start menu  for example. There they only added a shortcut to  the Babylon executable, without adding a separate folder. I’d rather have them add a folder that includes the shortcut to start Babylon, Uninstall Babylon, Uninstall the Toolbar and maybe some other useful shortcuts as well, for example shortcuts to important sections of their web site; a link to the registration/purchase form, to the license recovery form, to their support page or to their directory of dictionaries etc.

I thought at first that I have to go into the system registry manually to remove their Conduit Toolbar myself and by hand, because I didn't see it in the control panel when I was looking for it there. When I found the registry entry for it (I used the very useful and FREE tool Autoruns by Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell from SysInternals). There I noticed that they installed the toolbar into a separate folder below “Program Files” (or “Program Files (x86)” in MS Vista 64bit) titled "myBabylon_English" and not to a sub folder below their main program folder “Babylon". They also labeled it "MyBabylon Toolbar" in the add/remove programs section of the control panel (“Programs and Features” in Vista). Far away from the entry for the Babylon software at least on my computer which has hundreds of entries in that list.

They should have called it "Babylon Toolbar" that it appears below "Babylon" in the control panel and put the files in a sub folder below "Babylon" in the Program Files folder where it belongs! This is not unreasonable to ask, isn’t it?  Because of their blatant behavior, I am not even considering to use their toolbar and won't even add “http://search.babylon.com/home” to my “Custom Search Providers”.

In addition to the proper labeling and location for the program files, they should extend their installation routine. During the Install of Babylon, they should include in a SEPARATE step the follow options:

[x] Install Babylon Browser Toolbar for MS Internet Explorer?
[x] Change default MS Internet Explorer Homepage to Babylon Web Search (powered by Google)
[x] Add Babylon Search to Custom Search Providers for Internet Explorer & Mozilla Firefox

(o) Yes, I accept the terms of condition of Babylon
( ) No, I don't accept the terms of condition of Babylon.
Don't install any of the items above.


Then also add a screen to the Babylon configuration settings to change those settings again.

To set the defaults options to ON during the setup wouldn't be too nice either, but they would give users at least a chance to say explicitly NO, if they want to. If they really want to do it the nice and clean (in other words, the right way), then they would set the default options to OFF and provide some convincing arguments to the user why he should turn them ON.

p.s. Now I removed the freaking toolbar via the control panel and guess what, it requires me to reboot my computer; great! That was not necessary to install it without my knowledge in the first place.

Unbelievable!


Carsten aka Roy/SAC


Updates. September 28, 2009


I have not heard back from Babylon regarding my Customer Support request. I sent another message via their web form today. There I noticed something. I looked at my spam folder and got 3 messages there that coincide with the date and time when I used the contact form at the Babylon.com web site.


The messages looked like this. I “x’ed out” my email address (because of spammers):


The original message was received at Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 GMT
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<help@babylon.com>
(reason: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [213.198.65.7] blocked
using zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=213.198.65.7)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to ren.babylon.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 554 Service unavailable; Client host [213.198.65.7] blocked using
zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=213.198.65.7
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
<<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <cxxxxxx@cxxxxxxxxx.com>
Received: from www.babylon.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
(8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n8S7MMbr004826
for <help@babylon.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 GMT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 +0000
To: help@babylon.com
From: cxxxxxx@cxxxxxxxxx.com
Reply-to: "Babylon Ltd." <info@babylon.com>, cxxxxxxx@Cxxxxxxxx.com
Subject: Other
Message-ID: <f10f88d2f31ad510c062196a9d750882@www.babylon.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.0.2 (phpmailer.codeworxtech.com)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="b1_f10f88d2f31ad510c062196a9d750882

So from what it seems, my contact emails never reached them. Also not my feedback email.

I also tried the License Retrieval form on their site again, without success. This time I notice a message appear, which I did not see last time. But that message also points to a bug with that form as well, or am I too stupid to enter a captcha code?! See for yourself and tell me, if I entered the wrong code or not.

babylon license retieval form screenshot 09282009

I found an old support email from where they responded to my emails a few years ago and which also worked to contact them. I sent a copy of my form message to that email address as well. It did not bounce or generated some other error so far, so keep your fingers crossed. Man, this is just unbelievable.

I also sent an email to the addresses: press@babylon.com, bizdev@babylon.com and marketing@babylon.com, which I found on their web site. Basically a request to forward the message to somebody who is responsible for all this stuff and a link to this blog post. Lets see if that does something. Maybe the company is out of business and they forgot to shut down the web site yet. Who knows. Anything could be possible.

I will update this post again, once I got some news to report on this.

Updates October 5, 2009



  • I received an Email from the PR and Content Manager at Babylon on September 29, 2009 telling me that my email was forwarded to support and that I should hear from them within 48 hours. She also asked me for my phone number, which I provided in my reply.
  • I received an Email from Babylon Support on September 30, 2009. Responded to it with all the details that I submit via support contact form the week before on October 1, 2009. The message read like this:


    Thank you for taking the time to write us.

    I tried to reach you today but there was no answer.

    As I said on the message that I left you will be happy to assist you with any technical problems you have encountered, but I will need more specific details.

    Assuming you have Babylon installed and running on your computer, please be more specific and explain exactly what happens when you try to use or install Babylon. Do you get any error messages? If so - what are they?

    Thank you for your cooperation.

    Support was obviously not taking the time to read this post where I linked to from my email, nor did they find my contact attempts via their web contact form on September 23 and 28, 2009 (obviously).
    I provided my phone number. The contact attempt he refers to must be have been the call from a “private caller” with blocked caller ID that I received that day, but not responded to.
    Bad enough, but worse is this: No response to my direct email that I replied with to this day.

  • I received another email from a different support email account and person at Babylon.com on October 3, 2009, asking virtually the same as the other support person in the email from September 30, 2009.
  • I responded on October 4, 2009 with another copy of my email to the first support rep and also CC’ed that other rep in my response.
  • Sent a second email to both support email accounts with my phone number to encourage them to call me again. Based on the times when they sent the emails to me, there is a good chance that they received my email today, before they left the office in Israel (where Babylon is located).
  • The trial license to what the software switched to by itself on September 23, 2009, one day after I installed the software and applied my licenses to successfully expired by now also = The software does not run at all at this time anymore.

Update October 6, 2009


There was actually an email from Babylon support that Microsoft flagged a possible Phishing scam and that I thus just saw today, when I checked that folder. The email was sent to me on October 4, 2009 and contained instructions to reinstall the software and new license keys that worked. Again a set of multiple user name and key pairs to unlock all dictionaries and Babylon itself. They obviously check license codes by having the application connect their servers when users are connected to the Internet (hello Privacy.. Microsoft would have been tarred and feathered for this), but okay they do that, fine, why isn’t it possible then to just consolidate all my licenses into a single key and name that unlocks all of what I have licenses for at once?


Why so complicated, if it could be done easy?


I responded back to all support emails/reps that contacted me, to let them know that things are fine again (until next time) that they are not continue to try to fix something that isn’t broken anymore. The left hand does obviously not know what the right hand is doing, so I thought that I will help a little bit with that communication and coordination ;).


Until next year (I hope not, but I won’t be too optimistic)!

Monday, August 31, 2009

Fonts Collections: Over 31,000 Fonts (TTF, OTF, FON, AFM, PFB & PFM)

Yes, the title was not a typo, over 31K fonts for Windows XP, Vista, NT etc. There are multiple collections.

There are several collections of TrueType Fonts (*.TTF), which make up the by far largest chunk of the whole thing, plus separate collections for font formats like Open Type Font (*.OTF), Fixed Size Bitmap Fonts (*.FON), Adobe Font Metrics Files (*.AFM) and Adobe Fonts (*.PFM + *.PFB).

All in all over 1 Gigabyte (compressed) of Fonts, available for download at my Mediafire.com file share.

31KFontsCollection

Adobe Fonts Collection

4,000+ Adobe Fonts in PFx Format in font file pairs of: *.PFB Files (Type 1 PostScript Fonts) and *.PFM Files (Adobe Printer Outline Metrics Files)

PFM Files contain font metric information used by applications for laying out lines of text in a document. They also specify the Windows font menu name, kerning pair data, and a variety of other font-level information.

PFB is the Adobe Type Manager Type 1 PostScript font file format.

Adobe® Type Manager® (ATM) is a system software component that automatically generates high-quality screen font bitmaps from the PostScript® outlines in Type 1 or OpenType® format. With ATM, you can scale your fonts without the characters appearing jagged, and you can also enable "font smoothing," which further improves the appearance of your fonts onscreen by using your computer monitor's color palette to intelligently improve the rendering of characters. ATM Light also allows you to print PostScript fonts on non PostScript printers, and can be used to create custom instances of multiple master fonts.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-PFxFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-PFxFntCol2.ZIP (79 MB)

Adobe Font Metrics Files Collection

1,000+ Adobe Font Metrics Files in file pairs of: *.AFM (Adobe Font Metrics Files) and *.INF (Information Files)

AFM is Adobe's ASCII-based file format used for storing font metric data as human-readable data. AFM is the standard Adobe font file format.

The AFM format is also known as the Adobe Multiple Font Metrics (AMFM) and Adobe Composite Font Metrics (ACFM) file formats. In fact, AFM, AMFM, and ACFM are actually three variations of the same format. AFM files contain base or composite font information. One AFM file is used per master design of a font. AMFM files store control and global font information for a group of AFM files. And ACFM files contain the global metrics of the composite font program. AFM Specifications

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-AFMFntCol.ZIP (4.7 MB)

Bitmap Fonts Collection

Just a small collection of 87 Fixed Size Bitmap Fonts in the standard *.FON format/extension.

Bitmap font libraries, which were originally developed for the old 16 bit Microsoft Windows V3.x, but are still used in the latest Windows 32 bit version.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. Roy-FONFntCol.ZIP (663 KB)

OpenType Fonts Collection

2,799 Fonts in OTF Format (OpenType Font Format)

OpenType fonts from Adobe is a cross-platform font file format developed by Adobe and Microsoft based on Unicode. OpenType fonts from Adobe is an extension of the TrueType SFNT format that supports PostScript font data and new typographic features. Filenames of OpenType fonts from Adobe containing TrueType data have a .ttf. or .ttc extension, while filenames of PostScript based OpenType fonts from Adobe have an .otf extension.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-OTFFntCol1.ZIP 
  2. ROY-OTFFntCol2.ZIP 
  3. ROY-OTFFntCol3.ZIP 
  4. ROY-OTFFntCol4.ZIP

Note: Files were updated and the old links became invalid. Check this folder share to get the most recent files of this collection. You can also find other collections there that might be of interest to you.

TrueType Fonts Collections

Unlike a Type 1 font, a TrueType font consists of only one font file, a TrueType Font (TTF) file, used for both display and printing. TrueType files are installed in the operating system's Fonts Control Panel or Fonts folder. TrueType fonts are designed to display and print clearly at any point size.

PCL printer drivers send TrueType font information directly to the printer. Some PCL printer drivers enable you to send TrueType fonts to the printer as bitmapped images instead. See your printer driver documentation for instructions.

Bay Animation TrueType Fonts Collection

2,322 Fonts in the standard TTF (TrueType Font) Format. Bay Animation Fonts Collection. The fonts in this collection are only rough sorted by alphabet. Sorry.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-BayAnimTTFFntCol.ZIP (74 MB)

Categorized TrueType Fonts Collection

5,567 TrueType Fonts (*.TTF) / Categorized (or better "somewhat sorted" by some categories like:

  • Alte Schriften (Old Fonts)
  • Arabic Fonts
  • Blood & Horror Fun Fonts
  • Comic/Cartoon Fonts
  • Curly Fonts
  • Foreign Look Fonts
  • Fun Fonts
  • Grafiti Fonts
  • Halloween Fun Fonts
  • Hebrew Fonts
  • Mono Space Fonts
  • Ornaments/Decorative Fonts
  • Seasons and Festive Greetings Fonts
  • Space Age Fonts
  • Sports Fonts
  • Vintage/Nostalgic Paper Fonts
  • Xmas Fun Fonts

... and other categories

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-CatTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-CatTTFFntCol2.ZIP (98 MB)
  3. ROY-CatTTFFntCol3.ZIP (39 MB)

SchriftenFonts TrueType Fonts Collection

5,609 Fonts in the standard *.TTF (TrueType Font) Format. "SchriftenFonts" Collection, only sorted alphabetically

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-SchriftenTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-SchriftenTTFFntCol2.ZIP (26 MB)

Big TrueType Fonts Collection

9,640 Fonts in the standard TTF (TrueType Font) Format. Unsorted, BIG Collection

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-BigTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-BigTTFFntCol2.ZIP (98 MB)
  3. ROY-BigTTFFntCol3.ZIP (98 MB)
  4. ROY-BigTTFFntCol4.ZIP (26 MB)

Also don’t forget my previously released:

Scene Pixel-Art Fonts Collection Volume 1.0

A collection of over 600 font sets from demos, intros, cracktros, demo makers and other sources from the Atari ST, Amiga and PC. The collection is 37 MB in size and can be downloaded from my MediaFire.com account as well.

Download the Scene Fonts Collection here:  roysac-scenefontscollectionvol1.zip

I hope you will enjoy those collection and put them to good use.

p.s. Here is the link to the Mediafire.com folder share with all my previous collections releases.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Friday, August 28, 2009

Michael Dell Gone? Dell Starts to Suck Now too!

delllogo Michael Dell, the entrepreneur who founded the computer retailer "Dell" and built it into a multi-billion dollars business must be gone from Dell. Once a poster child for customer centric marketing, web site performance enhancement making it better converting and more user friendly at the same time.

Dell computers might not be the best computers on the planet in regards to their quality, but the company always made up for it via their customer support and service.

It seems that the drive to improve on things stops after an order was placed and hopefully starts over after the computer was shipped to the customer. That is what I hope, because my experiences after I placed my order for a brand new Dell Studio XPS 16 Notebook on August 11, 2009 (17 days ago) things started to become really bad.

Michael_Dell_Founder_of_Dell_Computers Flashback

I had serious issues with my computers to say it mildly. A series of hardware failures combined with the support that I paid for but never got, because the company who purchased the business from the retailer where I bought my previous notebook went out of business, 2 weeks before my hardware problems started. After all this misfortune I finally decided to buy another Dell. I purchased multiple Dell computers in the past and was overall happy with them and the service provided, if I had a problem with the machine.

I thought that my string of bad luck had an end, when I saw that there is a great promotion available for the Dell notebook that I was interested in. 20% off the entire order. Not bad. So I started to build my computer on the Dell web site. When I was done, I decided to take advantage of the option to buy the machine on credit without paying interests for a full year. I started the qualification process, but the process started to hang. I waited 10 or so minutes and then picked up the phone to call the Dell sales department.

They were able to access my shopping cart and we continued from there.  I got qualified for Dell Preferred program and a credit line that was much higher than what I needed. The sales rep was very helpful and I even made some adjustments to the machine configuration to improve on things a bit more. Especially the "CompleteCare" Warranty was important for me to make sure that things will be taken care of quickly, should I get an issue with the machine. I told the rep that I needed a computer quickly and even changed the shipping method for my order to Next Business Day for that reason.

The rep told me that the computer should be shipped within a few business days, which I was very happy about. When we were going over the entire order one last time, I noticed that the rep mentioned an estimated delivery date of September 11, 2009. I asked about it and said that this is not an acceptable date for me. I needed a new computer yesterday and not in one month. He said that this date is unrealistic and only to cover cases like unexpected hardware shortages. My order will be fine. I said that I will take his word for it.

Calling Customer Service

Well, a week and a half passed and the only thing that I got so far is the spare battery for the notebook.

I called customer services to inquire about the status of my order. There I got told that the machine is in high demand at the moment, which explains the delay. I said to the rep that I mentioned when I placed the order that it is urgent and that he can see that, if he looks at the delivery method. Normal shipping would have been free, but I paid $69 to get it as quickly as humanly possible.

I asked if there is a way that I could get a higher priority or expedited processing. I am of course willing to pay for this special treatment. He said, that Dell does not offer such an option, but that he will see what he can do to speed up the process. He didn't say how and also avoided to give a clear answer when I asked him that.

dellhelpdesk Another Call and More Bull

This Monday, August 24, 2009 I called again, but this time not being so nice anymore, because I felt being bullshitted and lied to. Not to mention that I am still in desperate need of a new computer. The computer is the tool that I need to make my living. My livelihood depends on it so to speak. A faulty or inadequate computer reduces to disables my ability to do my work properly, in the required quality and timely fashion. The rep could not help me at all and his manager was busy. I provided my phone number to get a call back the next day (it was already evening when I called on Monday).

I did get a call back on Tuesday, but the answers by the managers were the same and he repeated one sentence over and over again. "the estimated delivery date for this order is September 11, 2009. We do our best to deliver the machine before this date." Expediting the processing is impossible. Dell uses automated processed where no human can ever interfere with. My computer is in production, which makes any change to it impossible, including cancellations. I said, great, in productions means that they should have it ready to ship in a day or two, right? No, that is not the case, but it will be delivered on or before September 11, 2009. Aha, how long can things be in production at Dell; two or more weeks? How can I imagine this "being in productions"? Is there a box with all the parts that I ordered in a box with my name on it moving slowly a countless miles long assembly line that can take two weeks to process?

Man that must be the biggest plant on the planet. There must be Billions of Dollars worth of computer equipment moving around on those conveyor belts and they must be protected by a force field and self-shooting systems or something like this, because it is impossible for any human to access those, for example to pull up to the box with my name on it, load it onto a trolley, drive down a bit closer to the assembly area and load it back up onto the conveyor belts. It must be, because I offered to pay for the man's time and everything to just do that for me, but no money in the world is probably worth the grave risk for the workers life, if he would attempt the impossible and mess with the fully automated system that Dell created.

impossible_triangle Impossible is Relative

After a lot more screaming and yelling, it was suddenly possible to cancel the entire order. Well, almost entire, because I already got some parts. Something that was impossible 15 minutes earlier, due to the current status of the order, suddenly became possible. Interesting; I wondered what other impossible things would suddenly become possible, if I would keep pushing it. But I ran out of arguments and the ones like, maybe there won't be a customer to pay back the money for the computer, if they continue to delay the delivery of the tool that the customer needs to make a living. The only option left would have been to threaten the customer service rep and make him fear for his own life and/or the life of the members of his family. I didn't want to go that far though, although I might have punched him into the face, if that would have been possible over the phone line. :(

I could also not get an answer if any other Dell system would be faster to assemble and deliver. When I asked about the in-store option via Best-Buy for example, I learned that in case of Best-Buy, Dell would not take care of the Warranty. But in the case of Wal-Mart, but my Dell Preferred account would be worthless nor would I get the discount that I got with my order (and the coupon is not valid anymore too).

I first wanted to call Dell's sales department again, but then decided not to do so. I would not expect any help from their end and only more complications. Canceling the order would probably create more issues than I already got. Getting a new computer elsewhere within such short notice without paying too much for it or buying it from somebody who might not be in business anymore to fulfill his service and warranty obligations when I need it, seems not to be a promising alternative.

sistineGod Now it is in Gods Hands

Now I am stuck, waiting for that god damn machine and hope that all my yelling and calling did maybe trigger something behind the curtain at Dell that I will receive the notebook a bit sooner than expected. Everything else is in "Gods Hands" so to speak. I hope that there is no penalty for folks like me who are agnostics.

That Dell does not offer expedited processing, if a customer specifically asks for it and is willing to pay the price tag that comes with this special treatment is beyond my understanding. Moving a customer up in the queue, if he is willing to pay for it (I was willing to pay an extra $100 just for that) is not impossible to do, despite what the customer service rep was trying to make me believe. My order got stuck between orders by folks who are not in a hurry, like folks on vacation, who take things easy and let working folks who are in a hurry freely pass.  

Michael Dell? This is not rocket science and impossible to figure out. I am very disappointed about all this and only hope that the rest of Dell did not decay to the same low level, especially their technical support. I guess I am going to find out, on or before September 11, 2009... may be. :(

So long, a rather pissed off Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Friday, August 14, 2009

Data Collection, Sorting, Archiving and Access #1 (Thesis)

babbling my thoughts and theories to nobody and everybody, or in other words, to anybody who might be interested in it :). 

Introduction 8994_nervous_schoolboy_wearing_cap_and_gown_while_holding_his_diploma

I collected myself a vast amount of data and have issues with using them effectively. The lack of ability to find and use specific data that I collected when I need them is a problem that bothers me and where I am constantly working on improving. This problem of mine is of course a problem that pretty much every person has to varying extend, so there are of course numerous options and tools that were created by others already, trying to solve my exact issues.

Considering the fact that virtually everybody has the same problem and that so many "solutions" and tools exist to solve your problem, it surprised me, that virtually of them that I check out failed to solve exactly those problems for ME. This bothered me a lot and got me thinking why this is the case. It didn't make sense at first glance, but after giving it more and more thoughts, I started to realize why most tools that are out there fail to solve the problems for me. 

This is great, but does not help me with actually solving my problem. So I kept thinking about the problem itself, to learn that while the problem appears to be the same for everybody, generally speaking, it is actually not, if you start looking at things a bit more closely. Those differences can make a tool useless for me, but work perfectly fine for somebody else. Many of the differences can also be compensated for, by tools, if the amount of data is relatively small or the available computer resources (hardware, almost every aspect of it) are abundant and can be wasted by getting you what you want, but in a very inefficient manner. 

Pretext

Once the amount of data becomes too large and/or the resources available for the processing too low to get away with wasting tons of them are suddenly not there anymore. At that point the tool(s) that you are using break and become unable to solve your problem. In order to find or create (or inspire somebody else to create) a tool that is truly capable of solving the same problem with its subtle (but eventually significant) differences, for all or at least for most people, we must determine the basic elements and causes of the problems, the goals that need to be accomplished and their reason. 

Then we can think about ways that allow us to solve all those different problems in an efficient way to accomplish the set goals satisfactory.A one-fits-all approach does obviously not work.To accomplish what we want, the tool has to be able to adjust (or be adjusted by the user) to cope with the varying problems and changing facts, such as amount and diversity of data. 

I started with thinking about the root of the problem; the core and heart. I also tried to determine constants, the things that are the same for everybody, because deep inside there is always something that is shared across all the different scenarios that are possible due to the large number of things that can be different and the exponentially increasing number of possible combinations that result from it. 

Thesis

Underlying Context (A Theory)

People collect data throughout their entire life. I use the word "DATA", because information is not brought enough in my opinion. Most DATA collected by human beings are information of some sort. Information are per my own definition data that are classified and structured, viewed from the perspective of each individual human separately. I will use the phrase "Classification and Structure" repeatedly in this document and refer to it as C&S or spell it out, depending on what I feel to be appropriate. 

DCS-Illu

The C&S system is a collection of indexes and needed to access data quickly. If no C&S system would be in place, the data would have to be processed one by one, until the data that are currently needed are found. Data are like a pile of small boxes, where each box contains a junk. "C", the Classification,  would be labels put on the box, with keywords that describe the content. "S", the structure, would be stacks of boxes that share a common keyword, grouped in columns by even broader keywords, then rooms, floors, buildings, facilities etc. 

The same data might be classified and structured for one person, but not for another. Classification and Structure is stored separately from the Data, because every human develops his own framework and classification structure, designed for his current needs, priorities and understandings of the world. This framework is constantly changing and also expanding throughout the entire life time of each person. It is not and will never be static and fixed.

Of course, if classifications and structure can be found for the data that a person collects, it could be the case that it is identical or partially compatible with the persons own classification system and structure. In some cases it can be adapted (replicated) as is, but in many cases is it necessary to modify the C&S found with the data before it is integrated into the existing C&S. Different terms might be used for the same thing or the structure needs to be diversified or simplified. (See the box with my example for clarifications and illustration) 

 

Example: Differences of the C&S used for ONE set of Data by Different People

A set of geological data about the moons of the planet Saturn. The data were compiled by a physicist/astronomer who is working for an university. The astronomer is a member of NASA's Cassini mission team and his full job is to work with the geological data collected by the probe about the moons. Since the physicist is an expert, who was working for years already on this specific subject and thus makes up a huge portion of that persons life, the data related to this subject are structured very deeply and many scientific classifications are used where most ordinary people never heard of. As most NASA mission data, this geological data are published on the NASA web site and made accessible to the public.

A person interested in astronomy comes across those data and decides to "store" some parts or all of it in his own archive. The classifications used by the scientist would most likely too specific and replaced by more generic ones instead. The structure would probably be flattened and simplified as well. While the physicist distinguishes moons by very specific geological properties, like by type of material the moons are made of, or properties like "geologically active" or not, with atmosphere or without etc., the person does not, classifying all of them simply as "moon of planet Saturn".

A Bio-Technical Marvel

The data with the corresponding C&S is stored in the human brain (memory). The human brain is a marvelous archiving system with a huge storage capacity. But the capacity is not limitless. It has two different sets where it can store the data, which work differently. There is the set that contains recently collected data and data that were recently used, but collected a long time ago already.The access to those data is very fast and ready to use  in an instant, if needed.The second set, with the largest capacity, holds data that were collected a long time ago and not used for a while either. 

The long term memory, the humans data archive and vault. Most data stored here take some time to access, many even require that the right trigger (Tag, Specific Classification) is used to even find the data itself. Usually data that were not used for while that are stored in the short and mid-term memory, are "moved' to the archive of the long-term memory and then moved to the deep areas of the archive, the one that requires the use of the right triggers to access them again. The brain automatically determines the relevance of each data and drops the ones it believes to be not to be relevant anymore. 

Every Has Flaws

This marvel of biological engineering has some serious flaws though. Classification of data happens based on the current C&S system used by the person. Data are also altered (mostly shrunk) over the course of time and their move between or within the 2 memory sets.It is virtually impossible to determine now if and when a set of data might be required in the future again. Vital data might get dropped or shrunk and thus unavailable or useless, once we need them again or the classification system changed so much, that it became hard to impossible to find and deliberately use the right triggers to access data that archived deep in the long term memory

Humans are perfectly aware of this problem and used various methods to compensate for those limitations and shortcomings. Things, physical objects, that can act as a trigger to access data in the distant future can be kept and stored somewhere and used when needed. Those object might even contain some or all of the data itself. When writing was invented for example, documents could be created that contain all the data, so the object would not just be a trigger, it would hold the entire data itself and allow the complete reconstruction, if the data that were kept in a persons memory were erased, shrunk or altered. Storing just the data is not enough, if the amount of data comes very large. Accessing a specific one when needed is not easy to virtually impossible.

The Catch 

The C&S must be stored outside the brain, together with the data in order to be able to access data again in a reasonable amount of time. The C&S attached to the data can also be stored like a written document outside the human brain of course. 

There is a problem though. The C&S system of a person changes over time. It is possible that it changed so much that the C&S used in the past and stored with the data became virtually incompatible to the current C&S system in use.It would make the data that were stored as inaccessible as if no C&S would have been stored with them in the first place.

The C&S of data in the short, mid-term and to a limited extend also the long-term memory are updated by the human brain automatically, if a change in the C&S system of a person occurs. This update must also be done, manually, with the C&S of the data that were stored "offline" as backup. Updating it every time there is a change would be insufficient and consume too much time. It should be done though, before the number and type of chances become too much to be applied without loss to the "offline" archive. 

A Look at Human History

Humans created archives with data that are relevant and/or vital for the society as whole. Those archives are typically administered by people who's job it is to keep the C&S system used for the archive up to date and most importantly help other people who would like to use data from that archive to find them, by assisting with the matching of that persons C&S systems to the one used by the archive, exact matching preferably, but at least partially only a smaller set of data might have to be processed one after another to find the one that matches.

A New Age

Now we entered the digital age and the access, replication and storage of vast amounts of data becomes easier, while the amount of data that is created or made accessible grows rapidly at the same time. The limitations of physical archives in terms of physical storage space to keep it and the time and cost associated with the creation of the documents are multiple times less when done electronically. Thanks to the rapid advancements in technologies, this reduction of limitations continues in an exponential rate. 

People can now create vast archives that contain data of interest to them on a scale unheard of in human history. The climax would be reached, if ALL DATA in existence would be accessible to ANYBODY in an instant at ANY TIME, which is of course only hypothetical, because this will NEVER happen. As long as words such as privacy, intellectual property and secret have any meaning in human society, ALL DATA will never become accessible by ANYBODY. Some data will always be restricted to one individual person or restricted and limited group of people. This means that there cannot be just a single data archive for everything without the need to repeated replication. 

Back to Reality

The reality is that even today, some data that are accessible today, might not so in the future for different reasons. So if a person accesses data today and deems it to be relevant and important to be able to access in the future again, this person will replicate the data and save them somewhere, where he has control of it (add, edit and delete) and access to (read) whenever needed.

Even if people believe that access will be available in the future and replication of them not required for a large amount of data, the problem of C&S of those data remains. The creation of a general C&S system for this huge and centralized digital data archive cannot substitute the C&S system in place by an individual. It would be way too complex and detailed and thus be useless as an index for fast access.

Conclusion

The C&S system of the person only has the size and dimensions that an individual needs today. Refinements are made in areas where more data are collected and used, such as when a person becomes a specialist in something. Structures are simplified if the data become less important and/or less frequently used, for example in the case where a person changes his career or if an once important hobby becomes less interesting and fades away, maybe because something else is pursuit  now instead.

Does this make sense to anybody but myself? Are my assumptions and speculations making sense or am I missing the mark entirely? Voice your thoughts and opinions via the comments section below, openly or anonymously.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Friday, July 24, 2009

Suspicious, if not Fraudulent AT&T Rebates System

I just posted my article about my bad experience with my new Nokia phone, which I returned to my wireless provider AT&T where I got it from, in exchange for a new iPhone that is currently on back order and hopefully ready for me to pickup and use in one, latest two weeks.att-logo-orange-trans

How about "Semi-Fraud"? 

I don't know what word to use instead of fraud. Fraud implies illegal, what does not seem to be the case here. It might be illegal in Germany or other countries than the United States, but there is no indicator that I can see, which would indicate that it would be illegal here in the States as well. It is certainly suspicious and immoral at best. Beyond that it is up to you to decide what you want to call it or make out of it.

But I also don't have too much nice to say about AT&T. The only people who seem to hold stuff together there are the folks on the "first line of defense", the support guys who can only help as much as AT&T itself of the third party manufacturer of equipment are capable of.

"Heim ins Reich" or Something Like That

Some of the bull that comes with dealing with AT&T is the creation of some master-minds deep within the corporate headquarters of this juggernaut. AT&T was broken up once into smaller pieces, because it became so big that even the "pro-free-market" conservatives in the government knew that something had to be done.

That was several decades ago. My mobile phone provider used to be Cingular Wireless and my DSL (that I recently replaced with Fiber Optics) provider used to be Yahoo-SBC. They are all AT&T now.

This is just a note on the side. Maybe somebody feels the need to check once more, how big that beast actually became since it was cut down into pieces many years ago.

I mentioned fibre-optics already in my previous post. I also got this service (AT&T U-Verse) only recently. I basically ditched my old DSL and my Comcast Cable for TV and backup broadband Internet access and got AT&T U-Verse. Land line and wireless phone were already AT&T, difference there is only that the land line phone uses voice-over-IP (VoIP) instead of the traditional non-digital telephone technology.

Instant Rebate with Delays

AT&T offered like for everything else they have to offer, a rebate to customers, who think about buying a product or service from them. It helps to get the displayed price down, making customers belief that they get a better deal than they might end up getting at the end of the process.

Virtually ALL rebates are those crap-ass "MAIL-IN REBATES". This means that you FIRST pay the FULL price, even if you had to use a special URL or DISCOUNT code to get to the rebate offer in the first place. Then you get eventually the information needed to send something back to AT&T to APPLY to the REBATE. This does not happen automatically and is easy to miss. Learning from past experiences let me keep everything that I receive from AT&T until I got the rebate, including ANY packaging material and ANY piece of paper that comes with any equipment or any other mail (including stuff that looks like advertisement).

The reason for that is that it might turns out that you have to send something back to them that was attached to something that you and any normal human being would consider junk or garbage. Failing to provide this junk typically means to be unable to qualify and get the rebate. Getting a replacement of what is needed is typically impossible to get as well.

Well, I got U-Verse from AT&T about 2 months ago and I got finally the promised $100 rebate check that was advertised with a special coupon and made me respond to it.

Right Check, Right Bank, Wrong Amount

I went to my bank yesterday after my visit of the AT&T store to deposit the rebate check to my checking account. I am with Wells Fargo and their ATM's are capable of reading checks without envelope. That even works with checks that were written by hand (the amounts).

So the ATM sucked in the rebate check and scanned it. Then it asks for the confirmation of the amount and which of my accounts to deposit it to, checking or savings. I almost hit "checking" when I noticed that the amount was not $100 as it was printed clearly on the check itself. It showed $33.54 instead. Luckily I was only trying to deposit this one check. You can batch deposit several checks at once, what is what I typically do.

In that case I would have for sure missed the incorrect amount for the check and deposited it. I would probably notice the difference later at home, when I do my home banking, but at that time, the physical rebate check is gone. I have no idea what would happen, if I had deposited it and then contact AT&T customer service about this error, requesting the outstanding difference of $66.46. I don't know what the result of this would have been and  don't want to find out about myself.

ATTRebateCheckExample

The incorrect amount of $33.54 was read from the check. There is the number 34-54 above the number 730 and above the box with the actual check amount of *******$100.00 printed on that check. The check reader that had no problem with reading the correct amount from a personal check that I got from a friend nor any other check I received from various entities got the AT&T rebate check wrong. Bad enough, but worse, because it thought that it was actually reading the check correctly.

If it would have said that it cannot read the check and that I have to cash it within the bank through a human banker to verify the check amount, okay, a minor inconvenience, but at least one that does not lead to errors that can be overlooked and/or difficult to correct.

law_sign_questionCoincidence? That is Very Hard to Believe

I cannot imagine that this went unnoticed by AT&T, considering the number of rebate checks they must send out every single day for every single product and service they are offering to customers nationwide. My Nokia phone came with a mail-in rebate (which I did not apply for yet) and so does my new iPhone that I still have to receive yet.

What is to Gain?

So is it indented? I am curious to know how many people cash the check without noticing the error and thus get AT&T only a fraction of the rebate they are entitled for. Furthermore, what does AT&T do when I cash it with the wrong amount and demand to get paid the amount that is missing? If they pay up the difference, how long does that take? Playing the interest game, how much money AT&T is able to safe because of

  • delaying actual payment of promised rebates as long as possible?
  • delaying partial payments even further by sending initial rebate checks that are incorrectly processed by consumer banks automated check processing systems?
  • customers who are entitled for rebates not calling in those rebates as fast as possible (often due to the lack of information) or customers who fail to claim their rebates altogether?

You Decide for Yourself

Without knowing exact figures, my gut tells me... it must be MILLIONS of Dollars every month.

I cannot help it, but if this is not being done intentionally, then I must be completely paranoid or stupid.

Yeah, I know, It's because of the economy. It forces the most decent men to turn into vultures and immoral scum-bags Etc. yada yada yada ... Blah.. Right!

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Nokia Phone E71x Disappointment & The Super Mobility Promise

I was avoiding getting a smart phone with email capabilities and decent Internet connectivity for a long time. The reason for that is simple. I don't want to make myself accessible anywhere and anytime to everybody.

24/7/365 Any-Time / Any-Where Availability Curse

If you respond to any communication almost immediately regardless of the day of the week, time of the day and where you are at the moment, people will get used to it and act weird, if you suddenly change that habit and not respond as quickly as they expected. They might think that something is wrong with you or that they did something to upset you. But the only reason why you did not respond this one time was simply that you decided to take a time-out from your day to day business and personal life.

Making you accessible 24/7 is a double-edged sword. On the one hand it is good that you keep updated of things where ever you go and in almost real-time, at the same time makes this also very difficult to get your mind of things and to relax or to take a step back and re-evaluate your current place in your and your family's life.

supermobilitypromise

Interesting Facts about Taking Time Off

You take your mobile device on vacation for emergencies, but who are you trying to fool? Especially when you start a break, the mind will not be on that new "break'" / "vacation" mode. Even if you traveled half way around the earth and find yourself in a location that is very different to what you are used to, does the mind not let go of things that it is used to do and processes during all the previous months before you started your break.

A new environment helps, but what is needed is time, time that is not spend on anything associated with what your mind kept occupied before you got there. I cannot point to the source, but I heart one time that it takes about 2-3 days to one week for the mind to let go. Only at that point is it necessary for the body and mind truly to relax and to re-charge your batteries. I think it was a German study. It was definitely not something that I read while I was in the United States. That same study stated that this is the reason why a worker should have at least once per year 2 weeks of vacation in one piece, instead of taking a day or two off here and there.

One week to be able to really to let go (= waste) and the second  week to really re-fill your batteries and relax, release accumulated stress and pressure and prepare the body as well as the mind for another year of bombardment with stress.

Germans have more vacation than Americans. I think it is still at least 20 days per year, but typically somewhere between 25 and 30 days for most people. Maybe I read this stuff in a document that explained, why it was (and hopefully still is) required by law that an intern or employee of the age of under 25 years to take two weeks of his (I think mandatory 25 days) vacation in one piece, every year and that the HR department of the company where the young person is employed has to monitor and ensure that this is actually being done.

Making the Switch

Anyhow, I gave in to the pressure put on by myself mostly and got myself a new mobile phone with high-speed Internet access (3G) capabilities and Email support. I made the resolution that I won't change my habits too much when it comes to responding to people's emails to not give them the impression that I painted in elaborate visually descriptive worlds in the previous paragraphs.

att-logo-orange-transI (used to be) a Nokia Evangelist

nokia  iphone-logo

I am a fan of Nokia. I had some other phones by other providers like Motorola and Samsung in between, but always had issues with them that I never had with my Nokia's. Nokia phone used to be user friendly and easy to use without spending much time trying or worse, reading the manual. It had usually good to excellent reception and above-standard battery life.

The phone that I used all the previous years was a Nokia 6101. I went to a conference once and forgot the phone charger. I was horrified, because I knew that I need to use my cell phone constantly while I was at the conference and after (for the networking events and to hook up with people).

The conference was 3 days; I arrived one day before the show. You know what? The phone lasted to the last day. I only turned it off when I was going to bed and switched it back on the next morning. I was talking to people on the phone for hours and made/received dozens of calls. When I am not at a conference, the battery of the phone lasts easily 2 weeks and more. I never opened the user manual of the phone and was always able to do with it what I wanted without extensive searches and trying of all possible options available in the phone to find the one that I actually wanted to use. The option was usually always there and ready to use, when I intended to use it.

So instead of a fancy iPhone or Blackberry, I decided for a Nokia. The E71x to be exact.

NokiaE71xBewareAni2 Nokia E71x Review - Conclusion: HANDS OFF!

This phone did not work nor feel like a Nokia phone early on.

Transferring Contacts between Sim-Card & Phone One-by-One

The first shock I got was when I stored my contacts on my Nokia 6101 to my Sim-card (all at once, via an option that was easy to find, that I don't even know out of my head, where it can be found exactly), put it temporarily into my new Nokia (which came with a new AT&T Sim-card) and could not find the option to load all contacts from the Sim into the phone. I found out how to copy a single contact and how to either show contacts stored in the phone, on the Sim or both.

I gave up and opened the user manual. I quickly found the section that I was looking for, which to my surprise only describes what I was doing already myself, copy a single contact at the time. No mention of how to copy all contact to or from the Sim card. Don't ask, I still have not found that option, but it also does not matter. I don't have that phone anymore. But more to that in a little bit.

I had about 130-140 contacts that I kept in my old phone and needed to transfer to the new one. I did so one by one (which was time consuming, because not just because I had to do it one at a time, and for every phone number for a contact individually also, but because the option to initiate the copy was the most farthest away from when you opened the options sub menu for a contact in the detail page. There was also no short-cut to jump to the option, so I had to use the arrow keys to get there. 5 or 6 clicks, if I remember correctly.... every time, because it did not remember my previous choices of course.

(Short) Battery Life Time - A Crack Addict of the Power Charger

Next thing I noticed was that the phone went off entirely after less than 3 days, even though I just charged the whole thing completely. It sucked the whole thing empty within less than a week. I used the phone (to copy the contacts, configure some settings, browsing the web for 30 minutes and reading some emails) 2-3 hours at the most. The rest of the time the phone was on stand-by. I did not change the default power savings options, but assumed that it does not run on full power all the time as the factory default setting. I didn't check, but this is also not necessary anymore, because I don't have the phone anymore either.

I would compare the battery life-span of this Nokia with the Motorola Flip-phone that I used to have for a short while in the year 2000 (no, not the "Razor", that wasn't even around at this time). The phone practically hung on the charger whenever I was not on the road. I had a charger at home and the office and knew that I would be screwed, if I would forget taking it with me, if I had to leave town for more than 24 hours.

This was the main reason why I ditched that Motorola as soon as I could.

Internet Access - Watching Videos on the Phone - Disappointing at Best

I was able to access the Internet via the phone and checked out YouTube and tried to watch some videos. It did not work properly. I don't know if the connection was bad = AT&T's fault or if it was the phone.

The pre-installed video application, which pulled various videos using the build-in Real Player to access them was working somewhat. It also lagged in several cases, which interrupted the continuous play back of the videos.

Again, in this case might AT&T had to be blamed and not Nokia. I just mentioned it, because I did of course add to my overall experience. Being able to access interactive multi-media content with the phone was one of the more enjoyable features coming with a smart phone where I really looked forward to.

Email Access - Black Hole - No Sync or Recovery - BEWARES!

I found quickly the build in tool Xpress, which was the only one that had something remotely to do with accessing emails from existing email accounts via POP3 or IMAP. I use Google Hosted (Gmail basically) and needed to access it via POP3.

The application allowed me to do that, including the HTTPS secure connection via different ports and authentication for incoming as well as outgoing mails. The option that I could not find was the flag to "Leave Messages on the Server".

The email access on the phone was of course only intended as supplement, complimentary to the email client on my desktop computer. Well, since it had no setting to control this behavior, I wrongly assumed that it must always leave the messages on the server to prevent people from accidentally enabling this option. Well, it actually deletes messages after it downloaded them. Furthermore it also does not keep all messages. It only stores the last couple dozen or so and deletes messages beyond that figure (don't remember the exact number, but it was 50 or 100 at the most). It also deleted the messages that were not read yet.

Luckily for me, Gmail is setup to not delete messages, but archive them, so I did not lose emails entirely. I can still access them via the Gmail web interface. However, I cannot download them to my email client, because I have not found a way yet to reset the download/delete flag for individual or a group of email messages in Gmail. I can reset it for all emails that I have, 150,000+ of them, but I did not want to download all emails since 10+ years ago again to my computer, because I have 99.99999% of those already. But that is a different story. I posted (once again) at the Gmail support group/forum, but Google did not care about this issue when I pointed it out (in a different scenario) in the year 2007 and probably does not care more about it today.

Syncing (Everything) with a Desktop Computer (or Not)

I hoped to be able to sync at least what I got with the PC somehow. So I went and download the Nokia PC Suite software, connected the phone via USB with the computer (not via Bluetooth, which is also an option, because I did not want to take any chances) and ran the synchronization tool.

It downloaded my contacts from the phone to Outlook. It also downloaded my SMS messages that I received with the phone to somewhere. There was no sign of the email messages downloaded by the Xpress application though. I also could not find the option to access them somehow. I even couldn't find a way to access the file system and get the (probably binary) file where the application stores the data to my PC for analysis and possible recovery.

The Wrong Phone in Every Respect - for Anybody

I called AT&T tech support and tried to find out if I missed something here and learn about a way to recover and synchronize the downloaded emails somehow with my desktop email client. The technical support lady was very knowledgeable, I could tell. She was no douche-bag like some of those reps who don't know anything beyond what's scripted for them in the support manual.

No, there is no way and other things that I might want to do with the phone are also not possible with this Nokia phone, which does not follow any standard nor uses any standard software or operating system, no Windows Mobile and also no Android as far as I can tell. The phone was obviously a bad choice, it was not only falling short on what my needs are, it also falls short on what I would expect from a Nokia regarding the fundamental functionality to expect from a mobile phone.

Now I am Getting a Frickn' iPhone Anyway

I went to the AT&T store yesterday and returned it. I was thinking about getting a Blackberry, but then decided for a number of reasons for the iPhone 3Gs with 16 GB memory. I did not get the 32GB one, which is too expensive, but the 16 GB one wasn't on stock due to high demand. I will get the new phone next week or latest the week after that and use in the meantime my good old Nokia 6101, which was re-activated by AT&T for now.

Conclusion for the Nokia E71x Mobile Phone

If you planned to get this new Nokia phone and still do so, then I think that you did not read the previous paragraphs of this post. You might skim it too quickly and didn't get my message clearly. DON"T BUY THIS PHONE. It is not just the wrong phone for my personal needs, but obviously also the wrong phone for ANYBODIES needs. It is simply a bad phone. It sucks and Nokia should be ashamed to ever have put some crap like this on the market. Quality assurance at Nokia must have had time of or a gun at their heads or something like that. I don't know how else to explain how this junk ever got to show the name Nokia with everything that name represents to anybody outside the Nokia research laps itself.

One might think that a competitor replaced the phone with some junk to harm the Nokia brand name. Yeah, this could have been the case, if I had bought the phone off eBay.com from some dubious seller in Asia, but I got the phone directly and brand new (not refurbished) from AT&T directly. So the conspiracy theory can be thrown out of the windows right there.

iPhone3Gs 

One might say that I might don't have enough problems with technology at the moment and just needed another one of those to keep me occupied. Well, if you know me personally or read some of my older posts from end of last year etc. then you know that this statement was sarcasm pure. :|

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Friday, June 05, 2009

Copyright Complaint Notice Filings in the Scene? WTF?

It's not that I have already to deal with a lot of crap at the moment that something that just happened a few days ago has to come on top of all of it to "make my day" and "make my head shake in disbelief'".

It started with a big fat screen where you can see the snapshot of below, when I logged into one of my YouTube.com accounts. I was forced to acknowledge the message, before I could do anything else.

YouTube_Smash_Copyright_20090604

I was upset at first, because I thought that once more some idiot would claim something that is not his to begin with to cause trouble and inconvenience for YouTuber's, because they are full of themselves.

Dreyfus - Jarre - Oxygene & The Demoscene

Wouldn't be the first time. I still remember when in February 2008 a company with the name FRANCIS DREYFUS MUSIC came along and claimed the video recording of the PC/MS DOS demo called "Contrast" by the French demo group "Oxygene" from 1996 as their intellectual property that I was supposed to be infringing on. Well, Dreyfus did believe back then that any video with the word "Oxygene" in the title must be automatically infringing on the rights they hold for the music by the French musician Jean Michel Jarre with the same title.

Makes sense, doesn't it? Right ...

Anyhow, I did a Google search for the name of the somebody who claimed ownership of material used in some of my videos. Matt Swoboda, the plaintiff, turns out to be Matt James Swoboda, better known in the scene as "Smash" of Fairlight, Razor 1911, Beam, Insanity, Shadow and a few others.

Realtime Generation

ani2 The two video(s) in question used 12 and 45 seconds of a demo from 2008 by Andromeda Software Development (ASD) & Fairlight & Alcatraz, titled "Realtime Generation" (watch demo on Demoscene.tv), where "Smash" actually was one of the guys who created it, thus his claim was not so far fetched and absurd. I don't want to start debates about fair use and all this. I did use a fragment of the demo as back-drop for the intro of two of my amateurish videos with semi-professional background, but non-commercial use. In other words: I spent time on them and didn't receive a penny for it myself.

The full videos in question are available for viewing online and also for download in AVI video format at the following URLs below (in the case that you would like to make up your own mind about the use of the demo material).

Video 1: Download AVI (57 MB) - Watch Video on Facebook (requires FB account)
Video 2: Download AVI (72 MB) - Watch Video on Facebook

Anyhow, I do not intend to start a legal debate here, because that is not the reason why I blog this. My problem is the fact that a scener (Smash) filed an official copyright complaint against another scener, me, for something that could have been resolved quickly via a few emails, a phone or Skype call or chat instead. Since when did this become the means of communication in the scene? The time it took to prepare the official complaint was most likely more than the time it would have taken to check the background of the person behind the videos and to find the means to contact me. I did plaster the URLs to my web pages, including this one and all my other YouTube channels (including SACReleases) on the profile page of the YouTube account that hosted the videos in question (yeah, PAST TENSE is correct here, HOSTED).

Update/Addition: I just also recalled an incident at Dailymotion.com in January this year regarding the same material actually. There was a company called "Toei Animation" who claimed intellectual property ownership of one of the two videos. There was also no advanced email or anything, just a take down based on the claim by that company. I am unaware that anybody involved in the creation of the demo has any ties to that company and that they own anything of that demo. 

Team Mates or Hates?

Gosh, Smash and I were even in the same group once, Razor 1911. Both words in "team mate" seemed to have lost their meaning at one point from what it looks like.

Learn more about my past and present group allegiances here.

Misunderstandings?

I believe that I found Smash's LinkedIn profile and contacted him via the LinkedIn mail system (asking first, if the Matt Swoboda from the UK, is "my" Matt, who I am trying to get in touch with. A Finish scener with the name "Mandibular Joint Dysfunction" also contacted me via Facebook regarding this issue. He did not refer to the actual source of his information for me to check and follow up on, but I asked him to clarify where he heard of this "misunderstanding" (I hope that this is what it is).

The problem with those complaints in YouTube is that they don't go away and that my one account is now in jeopardy of being suspended because of anything that might comes up. YouTube does not care, double check or listens to anybody than a lawyer who threatens with legal actions in writing. I know this from first hand experience, since I got myself already an account suspended once, because of some BS, which caused some major pain in the ass for me, hours and hours of work lost and the unpleasant experience of "talking to a hand" that completely ignores you.

So resolving this "misunderstanding" means for me also that the official copyright complaint (actually two, one for each of the two videos) will be retracted that YouTube will remove those from my account history. Here is how it looks right now. Not very pretty, isn't it.

YouTube_account_status_cumbrowskicom_200906

Here is the video recording of my two little intros that started all this trouble

Backup Link to Video at Motionbox.com

As you can see, I did some modifications to the original video recording of the PC demo to make it suit my own purposes. Could I given credits? Sure I could have, but I didn't for several reasons. First, I didn't know who did what to be able to give accurate credits (I am still not sure about this part).

Furthermore, I only used tiny fragments of the demo and distorted it with effects and content that I created in front of the original video. The 2nd place demo at the party where Realtime Generation won 3rd place did a homage to some well know PC demos as well and also did not properly credited those, but everybody knew which demos were depicted.

I didn't give it another thought actually.

If you ask the question, how I would feel, if somebody would do the same with my art work, I'd say:
"No Problem"  and I actually made that one clear publicly in 2006 with clarifications added to it in 2008.

Update/Addition: I'd say something, if somebody would rip off my stuff and actively run around claiming that he did it. Not saying anything does not mean making a claim. If you want to know if somebody did something himself, entirely, partially or not at all, ask and see what the answer is.

If credits are "forgotten" and the creator asks for them, I would be the last to deny it to him. It usually boils always down to the question where and how to put them, without having the credits taking over the actual piece or destroy the setting where it is in. I added additional credits to stuff where I missed them myself and also asked others to add credits to their stuff, not always myself, but credits to other artists as well. 

Well, I hope that the the "Matt" at LinkedIn who I contacted is "my" "Smash" and that we will be able to sort things out. The LinkedIn profile says that he works at Sony now. Maybe he spent too much time "under some bad influence". Sony's approach to deal with copyright issues is not what I would call "consumer friendly" (I just say "root kit", do a Google search for "Sony root kit", if you don't know what I am referring to).

We will see. I will write another post, if something comes out of this.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

 Update June 9, 2009.

Somebody pointed me via a comment here at my blog, to the original Pouet.net forum thread where it all started (the one "Mandibular" mentioned in his FB message). I joined the discussion there and addressed more comments than I probably should have, but then it wouldn't be me I guess. Anyhow, the discussion seems to have shifted to over there. It's already three pages long, but I hope that this will not scare you off from checking it out anyway. I hope that in all the BS that also seems to be part of the discussion there actually a resolution will be found that makes everybody happy again.

p.s. Also a message by Smaash (misspelled) turned up. It was sent via the contact form at Cumbrowski.com about one day before the videos were already taken down by YouTube. The message was unfortunately sorted away with all those messages about "link exchanges'", "web development in India proposals" etc.  and I didn't get a chance to look at it in time (yeah, my main computer is still broken, I got a new main board, but now miss a power connector for the GFX card fan to the mother board. I was already checking at RadioShack and other stores, including a PC repair shop to get such stupid connector that fits, but nobody has this. I found something online, got that one shipped as well... and guess what, wrong size! Gosh, how many versions of a three pin cooler fan to mother board connector are there?

Gateway still gives a crap. I hope that they will be out of business soon too. Bastards. 

Update June 18, 2009

I had some extensive email communication going with Smash and tried to elaborate the reasons for my rage and what I saw as the biggest problem with his actions. I thought that I made it already clear enough that I also admit that I made mistakes too.  In case that it was not clear for somebody yet, here some quotes from my emails to Matt.

I admit my own mistake. It taught me the lesson that whatever you put anywhere online, publicly or or not public and not protected, will be out there for anybody to find, if you only look hard enough for it. In this case my experiments of the creation of a short video introduction (there are more of those by the way, nothing I would be particular be proud of, but once they are out there, there is nothing I could do about them now). It was used for something small and semi personal to get some feedback and along the way learn how to do things better (testing is one of the key elements in marketing that you cannot ignore or neglect, no studies in the world can replace actual tests) .

Where there was the discussion about it, I provided honest information about the source of the material and included references and credits. Then it was "over" and I moved on. However, the "pilot" or "test" did not disappear how it usually does in the offline world. If it happens online, it's there virtually forever. I did not think about that somebody would even care about those experiments from yesterday, and certainly did not assume that somebody would have any issue with them.

My biggest mistake was to forget that it can look for somebody else completely different and all brand new, because that person just got exposed to it now and stuff in the digital world does not age or decay. It's there, brand new, like on the day it was created. I also did not include ALL details related to every bit of the content, which gave room for miss-interpretations.

Matt understood the issue and said that he will try to retract the complaint at YouTube.com. That was 6 days ago on Friday June 12, 2009, but today Thursday, June 18, 2009 does it still show in my YouTube account the complaint and that my account is not in good standing.

I provided him with a lot of material regarding the copyright issue on the Internet, including some very bad examples where it is clear that the system is completely messed up and a harm to society in general. I hope that he now also understands my rage about the way he acted on the problem.

He is surely not a large corporation like Sony and just an individual like, but he unfortunately acted like a big corporation and used by extension another big corporation (Google) to get things his way. I believe that he was not aware that the corporate system in place today is truly against individuals and often creates significant collateral damage and overall more harm than good.

I also asked him for his advice regarding Pouet.net. I am still undecided, if I should post once more to apologize to the folks who I gave credits for comments that they did not make or if I should just let it be the way it is. My error was pretty obvious (afterwards) and I also was consistent with it, so folks should have been able to figure it out. I did not get a response regarding that from Mark as well. It is kind of odd, because he usually responded within less than 24 hours to my emails, until Friday.

I will send him another email about this blog update. The matter is still not completely resolved, because the main issue for me is still there and that is the note in my YouTube account. :(

Update July 14, 2009 and Conclusion

Matt hold true to his word and also be able to get through to somebody at Google to retract the Copyright complaint as promised. I Just check my YouTube account today to see, if anything changed and yes, the Warning is gone and the status shows "Good Standing" again. Phew... I think that this could have been resolved much easier and without creating as much headaches, but then I believe that everybody involved in this mess, learned some valuable lessons for the future.

YouTubeCumbrowskiComAccStatus20090714